City vs city
Clinton vs Fort Washington, MD
Fort Washington currently scores 7 points higher overall than Clinton, with the largest gap in hail.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality is a current EPA AirNow signal; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Clinton: 36/100 · Fort Washington: 43/100
Fort Washington is 7 points higher.
Flood
Clinton: 24/100 · Fort Washington: 16/100
Clinton is 8 points higher.
Clinton: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 2 features intersect this tile.
Fort Washington: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 5 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Clinton: 21/100 · Fort Washington: 21/100
No gap.
Clinton: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Fort Washington: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Clinton: 40/100 · Fort Washington: 40/100
No gap.
Clinton: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Fort Washington: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Clinton: 35/100 · Fort Washington: 31/100
Clinton is 4 points higher.
Clinton: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Fort Washington: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Clinton: 37/100 · Fort Washington: 55/100
Fort Washington is 18 points higher.
Clinton: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Fort Washington: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Clinton: Unavailable · Fort Washington: 87/100
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Clinton: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Fort Washington: Storm surge exposure derived from NOAA SLOSH MOM (AGL) data.
Wildfire
Clinton: 51/100 · Fort Washington: 49/100
Clinton is 2 points higher.
Clinton: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Fort Washington: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Current air quality
Clinton: 47/100 · Fort Washington: 42/100
Clinton is 5 points higher.
Clinton: Air quality signal derived from the latest EPA AirNow combined AQI grid.
Fort Washington: Air quality signal derived from the latest EPA AirNow combined AQI grid.