City vs city
Chance vs Fruitland, MD
Chance currently scores 9 points higher overall than Fruitland, with the largest gap in storm surge.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Chance: 35/100 · Fruitland: 26/100
Chance is 9 points higher.
Flood
Chance: 44/100 · Fruitland: 22/100
Chance is 22 points higher.
Chance: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 11 features intersect this tile.
Fruitland: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 2 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Chance: 25/100 · Fruitland: 26/100
Fruitland is 1 points higher.
Chance: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Fruitland: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Chance: 27/100 · Fruitland: 22/100
Chance is 5 points higher.
Chance: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Fruitland: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Chance: 4/100 · Fruitland: 15/100
Fruitland is 11 points higher.
Chance: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Fruitland: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Chance: 2/100 · Fruitland: 12/100
Fruitland is 10 points higher.
Chance: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Fruitland: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Chance: 85/100 · Fruitland: 34/100
Chance is 51 points higher.
Chance: Storm surge exposure derived from NOAA SLOSH MOM (AGL) data.
Fruitland: Storm surge exposure derived from NOAA SLOSH MOM (AGL) data.
Wildfire
Chance: 59/100 · Fruitland: 43/100
Chance is 16 points higher.
Chance: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Fruitland: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Chance: 30/100 · Fruitland: 30/100
No gap.
Chance: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Fruitland: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.