← Back to Baden snapshotCity comparison page

City vs city

Baden vs Clinton, MD

Clinton currently scores 3 points higher overall than Baden, with the largest gap in tornado.

Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.

Clinton

36/100

Open city page →

Hazard breakdown

Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.

Overall

Baden: 33/100 · Clinton: 36/100

Clinton is 3 points higher.

Flood

Baden: 24/100 · Clinton: 24/100

No gap.

Baden: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 5 features intersect this tile.

Clinton: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 2 features intersect this tile.

Wind

Baden: 21/100 · Clinton: 21/100

No gap.

Baden: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Clinton: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Lightning

Baden: 41/100 · Clinton: 40/100

Baden is 1 points higher.

Baden: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Clinton: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tornado

Baden: 0/100 · Clinton: 35/100

Clinton is 35 points higher.

Baden: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Clinton: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hail

Baden: 16/100 · Clinton: 37/100

Clinton is 21 points higher.

Baden: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Clinton: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Storm surge

Baden: Unavailable · Clinton: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Baden: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Clinton: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Wildfire

Baden: 51/100 · Clinton: 51/100

No gap.

Baden: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Clinton: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Ingested air quality

Baden: 44/100 · Clinton: 47/100

Clinton is 3 points higher.

Baden: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.

Clinton: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.