← Back to Teaticket snapshotCity comparison page

City vs city

Teaticket vs Woods Hole, MA

Teaticket currently scores 3 points higher overall than Woods Hole, with the largest gap in flood.

Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.

Teaticket

33/100

Open city page →

Woods Hole

30/100

Open city page →

Hazard breakdown

Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality is a current EPA AirNow signal; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.

Overall

Teaticket: 33/100 · Woods Hole: 30/100

Teaticket is 3 points higher.

Flood

Teaticket: 47/100 · Woods Hole: 27/100

Teaticket is 20 points higher.

Teaticket: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 12 features intersect this tile.

Woods Hole: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 7 features intersect this tile.

Wind

Teaticket: 38/100 · Woods Hole: 38/100

No gap.

Teaticket: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Woods Hole: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Lightning

Teaticket: 10/100 · Woods Hole: 10/100

No gap.

Teaticket: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Woods Hole: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tornado

Teaticket: 0/100 · Woods Hole: 4/100

Woods Hole is 4 points higher.

Teaticket: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Woods Hole: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hail

Teaticket: 5/100 · Woods Hole: 9/100

Woods Hole is 4 points higher.

Teaticket: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Woods Hole: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Storm surge

Teaticket: 98/100 · Woods Hole: 98/100

No gap.

Teaticket: Storm surge exposure derived from NOAA SLOSH MOM (AGL) data.

Woods Hole: Storm surge exposure derived from NOAA SLOSH MOM (AGL) data.

Wildfire

Teaticket: 6/100 · Woods Hole: 24/100

Woods Hole is 18 points higher.

Teaticket: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Woods Hole: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Current air quality

Teaticket: 28/100 · Woods Hole: 28/100

No gap.

Teaticket: Air quality signal derived from the latest EPA AirNow combined AQI grid.

Woods Hole: Air quality signal derived from the latest EPA AirNow combined AQI grid.