City vs city
Walker vs Watson, LA
Walker currently scores 4 points higher overall than Watson, with the largest gap in hail.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Walker: 51/100 · Watson: 47/100
Walker is 4 points higher.
Flood
Walker: 35/100 · Watson: 35/100
No gap.
Walker: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 10 features intersect this tile.
Watson: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 14 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Walker: 32/100 · Watson: 29/100
Walker is 3 points higher.
Walker: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Watson: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Walker: 99/100 · Watson: 99/100
No gap.
Walker: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Watson: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Walker: 23/100 · Watson: 4/100
Walker is 19 points higher.
Walker: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Watson: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Walker: 49/100 · Watson: 77/100
Watson is 28 points higher.
Walker: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Watson: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Walker: 77/100 · Watson: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Walker: Storm surge exposure derived from NOAA SLOSH MOM (AGL) data.
Watson: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Walker: 59/100 · Watson: 57/100
Walker is 2 points higher.
Walker: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Watson: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Walker: 30/100 · Watson: 26/100
Walker is 4 points higher.
Walker: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Watson: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.