← Back to Grambling snapshotCity comparison page

City vs city

Grambling vs Houma, LA

Houma currently scores 4 points higher overall than Grambling, with the largest gap in hail.

Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.

Grambling

41/100

Open city page →

Hazard breakdown

Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.

Overall

Grambling: 41/100 · Houma: 45/100

Houma is 4 points higher.

Flood

Grambling: 14/100 · Houma: 42/100

Houma is 28 points higher.

Grambling: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 5 features intersect this tile.

Houma: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 9 features intersect this tile.

Wind

Grambling: 14/100 · Houma: 57/100

Houma is 43 points higher.

Grambling: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Houma: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Lightning

Grambling: 70/100 · Houma: 76/100

Houma is 6 points higher.

Grambling: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Houma: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tornado

Grambling: 35/100 · Houma: 15/100

Grambling is 20 points higher.

Grambling: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Houma: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hail

Grambling: 77/100 · Houma: 23/100

Grambling is 54 points higher.

Grambling: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Houma: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Storm surge

Grambling: Unavailable · Houma: 97/100

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Grambling: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Houma: Storm surge exposure derived from NOAA SLOSH MOM (AGL) data.

Wildfire

Grambling: 58/100 · Houma: 40/100

Grambling is 18 points higher.

Grambling: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Houma: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Ingested air quality

Grambling: 19/100 · Houma: 13/100

Grambling is 6 points higher.

Grambling: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.

Houma: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.