City vs city
Central vs Clinton, LA
Central currently scores 8 points higher overall than Clinton, with the largest gap in hail.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Central: 47/100 · Clinton: 39/100
Central is 8 points higher.
Flood
Central: 35/100 · Clinton: 19/100
Central is 16 points higher.
Central: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 17 features intersect this tile.
Clinton: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 7 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Central: 29/100 · Clinton: 24/100
Central is 5 points higher.
Central: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Clinton: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Central: 98/100 · Clinton: 99/100
Clinton is 1 points higher.
Central: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Clinton: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Central: 50/100 · Clinton: 31/100
Central is 19 points higher.
Central: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Clinton: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Central: 49/100 · Clinton: 21/100
Central is 28 points higher.
Central: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Clinton: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Central: Unavailable · Clinton: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Central: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Clinton: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Central: 50/100 · Clinton: 61/100
Clinton is 11 points higher.
Central: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Clinton: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Central: 18/100 · Clinton: 21/100
Clinton is 3 points higher.
Central: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Clinton: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.