City vs city
Baker vs Clinton, LA
Baker currently scores 3 points higher overall than Clinton, with the largest gap in hail.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Baker: 42/100 · Clinton: 39/100
Baker is 3 points higher.
Flood
Baker: 24/100 · Clinton: 19/100
Baker is 5 points higher.
Baker: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 13 features intersect this tile.
Clinton: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 7 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Baker: 29/100 · Clinton: 24/100
Baker is 5 points higher.
Baker: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Clinton: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Baker: 98/100 · Clinton: 99/100
Clinton is 1 points higher.
Baker: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Clinton: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Baker: 23/100 · Clinton: 31/100
Clinton is 8 points higher.
Baker: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Clinton: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Baker: 75/100 · Clinton: 21/100
Baker is 54 points higher.
Baker: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Clinton: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Baker: Unavailable · Clinton: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Baker: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Clinton: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Baker: 26/100 · Clinton: 61/100
Clinton is 35 points higher.
Baker: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Clinton: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Baker: 18/100 · Clinton: 21/100
Clinton is 3 points higher.
Baker: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Clinton: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.