City vs city

Bowling Green vs Fort Thomas, KY

Bowling Green currently scores 12 points higher overall than Fort Thomas, with the largest gap in tornado.

Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.

Bowling Green

48/100

Open city page →

Fort Thomas

36/100

Open city page →

Hazard breakdown

Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.

Overall

Bowling Green: 48/100 · Fort Thomas: 36/100

Bowling Green is 12 points higher.

Flood

Bowling Green: 36/100 · Fort Thomas: 16/100

Bowling Green is 20 points higher.

Bowling Green: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 2 features intersect this tile.

Fort Thomas: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 3 features intersect this tile.

Wind

Bowling Green: 14/100 · Fort Thomas: 15/100

Fort Thomas is 1 points higher.

Bowling Green: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Fort Thomas: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Lightning

Bowling Green: 52/100 · Fort Thomas: 49/100

Bowling Green is 3 points higher.

Bowling Green: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Fort Thomas: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tornado

Bowling Green: 62/100 · Fort Thomas: 0/100

Bowling Green is 62 points higher.

Bowling Green: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Fort Thomas: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hail

Bowling Green: 100/100 · Fort Thomas: 100/100

No gap.

Bowling Green: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Fort Thomas: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Storm surge

Bowling Green: Unavailable · Fort Thomas: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Bowling Green: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Fort Thomas: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Wildfire

Bowling Green: 35/100 · Fort Thomas: 2/100

Bowling Green is 33 points higher.

Bowling Green: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Fort Thomas: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Ingested air quality

Bowling Green: 34/100 · Fort Thomas: 35/100

Fort Thomas is 1 points higher.

Bowling Green: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.

Fort Thomas: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.