City vs city
Norway vs Washington, KS
Washington currently scores 5 points higher overall than Norway, with the largest gap in hail.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Norway: 39/100 · Washington: 44/100
Washington is 5 points higher.
Flood
Norway: 91/100 · Washington: 53/100
Norway is 38 points higher.
Norway: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 7 features intersect this tile.
Washington: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 3 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Norway: 18/100 · Washington: 18/100
No gap.
Norway: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Washington: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Norway: 59/100 · Washington: 54/100
Norway is 5 points higher.
Norway: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Washington: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Norway: 12/100 · Washington: 23/100
Washington is 11 points higher.
Norway: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Washington: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Norway: 53/100 · Washington: 100/100
Washington is 47 points higher.
Norway: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Washington: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Norway: Unavailable · Washington: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Norway: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Washington: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Norway: 26/100 · Washington: 47/100
Washington is 21 points higher.
Norway: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Washington: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Norway: 13/100 · Washington: 14/100
Washington is 1 points higher.
Norway: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Washington: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.