City vs city
Haven vs Yoder, KS
Haven currently scores 8 points higher overall than Yoder, with the largest gap in hail.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Haven: 55/100 · Yoder: 47/100
Haven is 8 points higher.
Flood
Haven: 91/100 · Yoder: 66/100
Haven is 25 points higher.
Haven: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 12 features intersect this tile.
Yoder: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 12 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Haven: 18/100 · Yoder: 18/100
No gap.
Haven: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Yoder: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Haven: 71/100 · Yoder: 69/100
Haven is 2 points higher.
Haven: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Yoder: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Haven: 0/100 · Yoder: 4/100
Yoder is 4 points higher.
Haven: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Yoder: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Haven: 65/100 · Yoder: 100/100
Yoder is 35 points higher.
Haven: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Yoder: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Haven: Unavailable · Yoder: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Haven: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Yoder: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Haven: 55/100 · Yoder: 46/100
Haven is 9 points higher.
Haven: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Yoder: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Haven: 28/100 · Yoder: 28/100
No gap.
Haven: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Yoder: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.