City vs city
Attica vs Kingman, KS
Attica currently scores 8 points higher overall than Kingman, with the largest gap in tornado.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Attica: 52/100 · Kingman: 44/100
Attica is 8 points higher.
Flood
Attica: 49/100 · Kingman: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Attica: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 10 features intersect this tile.
Kingman: Flood model is not available for this location yet.
Wind
Attica: 18/100 · Kingman: 18/100
No gap.
Attica: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Kingman: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Attica: 62/100 · Kingman: 67/100
Kingman is 5 points higher.
Attica: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Kingman: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Attica: 88/100 · Kingman: 46/100
Attica is 42 points higher.
Attica: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Kingman: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Attica: 100/100 · Kingman: 100/100
No gap.
Attica: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Kingman: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Attica: Unavailable · Kingman: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Attica: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Kingman: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Attica: 23/100 · Kingman: 52/100
Kingman is 29 points higher.
Attica: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Kingman: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Attica: 27/100 · Kingman: 28/100
Kingman is 1 points higher.
Attica: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Kingman: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.