City vs city
Leo-Cedarville vs Woodburn, IN
Leo-Cedarville currently scores 9 points higher overall than Woodburn, with the largest gap in flood.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Leo-Cedarville: 29/100 · Woodburn: 20/100
Leo-Cedarville is 9 points higher.
Flood
Leo-Cedarville: 30/100 · Woodburn: 0/100
Leo-Cedarville is 30 points higher.
Leo-Cedarville: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 5 features intersect this tile.
Woodburn: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 0 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Leo-Cedarville: 16/100 · Woodburn: 16/100
No gap.
Leo-Cedarville: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Woodburn: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Leo-Cedarville: 46/100 · Woodburn: 46/100
No gap.
Leo-Cedarville: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Woodburn: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Leo-Cedarville: 0/100 · Woodburn: 4/100
Woodburn is 4 points higher.
Leo-Cedarville: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Woodburn: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Leo-Cedarville: 48/100 · Woodburn: 35/100
Leo-Cedarville is 13 points higher.
Leo-Cedarville: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Woodburn: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Leo-Cedarville: Unavailable · Woodburn: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Leo-Cedarville: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Woodburn: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Leo-Cedarville: 4/100 · Woodburn: 11/100
Woodburn is 7 points higher.
Leo-Cedarville: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Woodburn: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Leo-Cedarville: 30/100 · Woodburn: 30/100
No gap.
Leo-Cedarville: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Woodburn: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.