City vs city
Garrett vs Leo-Cedarville, IN
Leo-Cedarville currently scores 2 points higher overall than Garrett, with the largest gap in wildfire.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Garrett: 27/100 · Leo-Cedarville: 29/100
Leo-Cedarville is 2 points higher.
Flood
Garrett: 32/100 · Leo-Cedarville: 30/100
Garrett is 2 points higher.
Garrett: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 7 features intersect this tile.
Leo-Cedarville: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 5 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Garrett: 16/100 · Leo-Cedarville: 16/100
No gap.
Garrett: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Leo-Cedarville: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Garrett: 45/100 · Leo-Cedarville: 46/100
Leo-Cedarville is 1 points higher.
Garrett: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Leo-Cedarville: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Garrett: 4/100 · Leo-Cedarville: 0/100
Garrett is 4 points higher.
Garrett: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Leo-Cedarville: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Garrett: 50/100 · Leo-Cedarville: 48/100
Garrett is 2 points higher.
Garrett: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Leo-Cedarville: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Garrett: Unavailable · Leo-Cedarville: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Garrett: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Leo-Cedarville: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Garrett: 9/100 · Leo-Cedarville: 4/100
Garrett is 5 points higher.
Garrett: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Leo-Cedarville: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Garrett: 30/100 · Leo-Cedarville: 30/100
No gap.
Garrett: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Leo-Cedarville: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.