City vs city
Butler vs Leo-Cedarville, IN
Leo-Cedarville currently scores 8 points higher overall than Butler, with the largest gap in flood.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Butler: 21/100 · Leo-Cedarville: 29/100
Leo-Cedarville is 8 points higher.
Flood
Butler: 0/100 · Leo-Cedarville: 30/100
Leo-Cedarville is 30 points higher.
Butler: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 0 features intersect this tile.
Leo-Cedarville: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 5 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Butler: 16/100 · Leo-Cedarville: 16/100
No gap.
Butler: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Leo-Cedarville: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Butler: 39/100 · Leo-Cedarville: 46/100
Leo-Cedarville is 7 points higher.
Butler: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Leo-Cedarville: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Butler: 0/100 · Leo-Cedarville: 0/100
No gap.
Butler: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Leo-Cedarville: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Butler: 22/100 · Leo-Cedarville: 48/100
Leo-Cedarville is 26 points higher.
Butler: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Leo-Cedarville: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Butler: Unavailable · Leo-Cedarville: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Butler: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Leo-Cedarville: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Butler: 18/100 · Leo-Cedarville: 4/100
Butler is 14 points higher.
Butler: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Leo-Cedarville: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Butler: 30/100 · Leo-Cedarville: 30/100
No gap.
Butler: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Leo-Cedarville: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.