City vs city
Bloomington vs Leo-Cedarville, IN
Bloomington currently scores 18 points higher overall than Leo-Cedarville, with the largest gap in hail.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Bloomington: 47/100 · Leo-Cedarville: 29/100
Bloomington is 18 points higher.
Flood
Bloomington: 30/100 · Leo-Cedarville: 30/100
No gap.
Bloomington: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 4 features intersect this tile.
Leo-Cedarville: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 5 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Bloomington: 15/100 · Leo-Cedarville: 16/100
Leo-Cedarville is 1 points higher.
Bloomington: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Leo-Cedarville: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Bloomington: 76/100 · Leo-Cedarville: 46/100
Bloomington is 30 points higher.
Bloomington: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Leo-Cedarville: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Bloomington: 46/100 · Leo-Cedarville: 0/100
Bloomington is 46 points higher.
Bloomington: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Leo-Cedarville: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Bloomington: 100/100 · Leo-Cedarville: 48/100
Bloomington is 52 points higher.
Bloomington: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Leo-Cedarville: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Bloomington: Unavailable · Leo-Cedarville: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Bloomington: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Leo-Cedarville: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Bloomington: 34/100 · Leo-Cedarville: 4/100
Bloomington is 30 points higher.
Bloomington: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Leo-Cedarville: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Bloomington: 28/100 · Leo-Cedarville: 30/100
Leo-Cedarville is 2 points higher.
Bloomington: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Leo-Cedarville: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.