City vs city
Auburn vs Leo-Cedarville, IN
Leo-Cedarville currently scores 3 points higher overall than Auburn, with the largest gap in flood.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Auburn: 26/100 · Leo-Cedarville: 29/100
Leo-Cedarville is 3 points higher.
Flood
Auburn: 38/100 · Leo-Cedarville: 30/100
Auburn is 8 points higher.
Auburn: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 5 features intersect this tile.
Leo-Cedarville: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 5 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Auburn: 16/100 · Leo-Cedarville: 16/100
No gap.
Auburn: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Leo-Cedarville: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Auburn: 43/100 · Leo-Cedarville: 46/100
Leo-Cedarville is 3 points higher.
Auburn: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Leo-Cedarville: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Auburn: 4/100 · Leo-Cedarville: 0/100
Auburn is 4 points higher.
Auburn: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Leo-Cedarville: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Auburn: 42/100 · Leo-Cedarville: 48/100
Leo-Cedarville is 6 points higher.
Auburn: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Leo-Cedarville: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Auburn: Unavailable · Leo-Cedarville: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Auburn: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Leo-Cedarville: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Auburn: 9/100 · Leo-Cedarville: 4/100
Auburn is 5 points higher.
Auburn: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Leo-Cedarville: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Auburn: 30/100 · Leo-Cedarville: 30/100
No gap.
Auburn: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Leo-Cedarville: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.