City vs city

Mount Prospect vs Rolling Meadows, IL

Mount Prospect currently scores 1 points higher overall than Rolling Meadows, with the largest gap in tornado.

Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.

Mount Prospect

40/100

Open city page →

Rolling Meadows

39/100

Open city page →

Hazard breakdown

Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality is a current EPA AirNow signal; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.

Overall

Mount Prospect: 40/100 · Rolling Meadows: 39/100

Mount Prospect is 1 points higher.

Flood

Mount Prospect: 37/100 · Rolling Meadows: 46/100

Rolling Meadows is 9 points higher.

Mount Prospect: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 5 features intersect this tile.

Rolling Meadows: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 7 features intersect this tile.

Wind

Mount Prospect: 16/100 · Rolling Meadows: 16/100

No gap.

Mount Prospect: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Rolling Meadows: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Lightning

Mount Prospect: 44/100 · Rolling Meadows: 46/100

Rolling Meadows is 2 points higher.

Mount Prospect: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Rolling Meadows: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tornado

Mount Prospect: 38/100 · Rolling Meadows: 15/100

Mount Prospect is 23 points higher.

Mount Prospect: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Rolling Meadows: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hail

Mount Prospect: 100/100 · Rolling Meadows: 97/100

Mount Prospect is 3 points higher.

Mount Prospect: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Rolling Meadows: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Storm surge

Mount Prospect: Unavailable · Rolling Meadows: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Mount Prospect: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Rolling Meadows: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Wildfire

Mount Prospect: 20/100 · Rolling Meadows: 23/100

Rolling Meadows is 3 points higher.

Mount Prospect: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Rolling Meadows: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Current air quality

Mount Prospect: 26/100 · Rolling Meadows: 27/100

Rolling Meadows is 1 points higher.

Mount Prospect: Air quality signal derived from the latest EPA AirNow combined AQI grid.

Rolling Meadows: Air quality signal derived from the latest EPA AirNow combined AQI grid.