← Back to Chicago snapshotCity comparison page

City vs city

Chicago vs Rolling Meadows, IL

Chicago currently scores 1 points higher overall than Rolling Meadows, with the largest gap in tornado.

Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.

Chicago

40/100

Open city page →

Rolling Meadows

39/100

Open city page →

Hazard breakdown

Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.

Overall

Chicago: 40/100 · Rolling Meadows: 39/100

Chicago is 1 points higher.

Flood

Chicago: 44/100 · Rolling Meadows: 46/100

Rolling Meadows is 2 points higher.

Chicago: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 10 features intersect this tile.

Rolling Meadows: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 7 features intersect this tile.

Wind

Chicago: 16/100 · Rolling Meadows: 16/100

No gap.

Chicago: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Rolling Meadows: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Lightning

Chicago: 35/100 · Rolling Meadows: 46/100

Rolling Meadows is 11 points higher.

Chicago: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Rolling Meadows: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tornado

Chicago: 27/100 · Rolling Meadows: 15/100

Chicago is 12 points higher.

Chicago: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Rolling Meadows: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hail

Chicago: 100/100 · Rolling Meadows: 97/100

Chicago is 3 points higher.

Chicago: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Rolling Meadows: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Storm surge

Chicago: Unavailable · Rolling Meadows: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Chicago: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Rolling Meadows: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Wildfire

Chicago: 27/100 · Rolling Meadows: 23/100

Chicago is 4 points higher.

Chicago: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Rolling Meadows: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Ingested air quality

Chicago: 28/100 · Rolling Meadows: 27/100

Chicago is 1 points higher.

Chicago: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.

Rolling Meadows: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.