City vs city
Hansen vs Twin Falls, ID
Twin Falls currently scores 1 points higher overall than Hansen, with the largest gap in hail.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Hansen: 21/100 · Twin Falls: 22/100
Twin Falls is 1 points higher.
Flood
Hansen: 19/100 · Twin Falls: 21/100
Twin Falls is 2 points higher.
Hansen: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 2 features intersect this tile.
Twin Falls: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 2 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Hansen: 12/100 · Twin Falls: 12/100
No gap.
Hansen: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Twin Falls: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Hansen: 11/100 · Twin Falls: 11/100
No gap.
Hansen: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Twin Falls: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Hansen: 0/100 · Twin Falls: 8/100
Twin Falls is 8 points higher.
Hansen: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Twin Falls: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Hansen: 10/100 · Twin Falls: 37/100
Twin Falls is 27 points higher.
Hansen: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Twin Falls: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Hansen: Unavailable · Twin Falls: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Hansen: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Twin Falls: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Hansen: 53/100 · Twin Falls: 45/100
Hansen is 8 points higher.
Hansen: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Twin Falls: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Hansen: 20/100 · Twin Falls: 18/100
Hansen is 2 points higher.
Hansen: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Twin Falls: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.