City vs city
Hamer vs Roberts, ID
Roberts currently scores 3 points higher overall than Hamer, with the largest gap in wildfire.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Hamer: 17/100 · Roberts: 20/100
Roberts is 3 points higher.
Flood
Hamer: Unavailable · Roberts: 26/100
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Hamer: Flood model is not available for this location yet.
Roberts: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 7 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Hamer: 14/100 · Roberts: 14/100
No gap.
Hamer: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Roberts: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Hamer: 8/100 · Roberts: 8/100
No gap.
Hamer: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Roberts: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Hamer: 0/100 · Roberts: 19/100
Roberts is 19 points higher.
Hamer: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Roberts: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Hamer: 1/100 · Roberts: 15/100
Roberts is 14 points higher.
Hamer: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Roberts: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Hamer: Unavailable · Roberts: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Hamer: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Roberts: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Hamer: 61/100 · Roberts: 41/100
Hamer is 20 points higher.
Hamer: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Roberts: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Hamer: 16/100 · Roberts: 15/100
Hamer is 1 points higher.
Hamer: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Roberts: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.