City vs city
Greenleaf vs Marsing, ID
Greenleaf currently scores 4 points higher overall than Marsing, with the largest gap in flood.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Greenleaf: 16/100 · Marsing: 12/100
Greenleaf is 4 points higher.
Flood
Greenleaf: 20/100 · Marsing: 3/100
Greenleaf is 17 points higher.
Greenleaf: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 3 features intersect this tile.
Marsing: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 2 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Greenleaf: 10/100 · Marsing: 10/100
No gap.
Greenleaf: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Marsing: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Greenleaf: 7/100 · Marsing: 7/100
No gap.
Greenleaf: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Marsing: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Greenleaf: 0/100 · Marsing: 0/100
No gap.
Greenleaf: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Marsing: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Greenleaf: 3/100 · Marsing: 2/100
Greenleaf is 1 points higher.
Greenleaf: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Marsing: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Greenleaf: Unavailable · Marsing: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Greenleaf: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Marsing: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Greenleaf: 42/100 · Marsing: 36/100
Greenleaf is 6 points higher.
Greenleaf: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Marsing: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Greenleaf: 11/100 · Marsing: 11/100
No gap.
Greenleaf: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Marsing: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.