City vs city
Buhl vs Hagerman, ID
Hagerman currently scores 1 points higher overall than Buhl, with the largest gap in hail.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Buhl: 15/100 · Hagerman: 16/100
Hagerman is 1 points higher.
Flood
Buhl: Unavailable · Hagerman: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Buhl: Flood model is not available for this location yet.
Hagerman: Flood model is not available for this location yet.
Wind
Buhl: 11/100 · Hagerman: 11/100
No gap.
Buhl: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Hagerman: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Buhl: 10/100 · Hagerman: 8/100
Buhl is 2 points higher.
Buhl: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Hagerman: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Buhl: 0/100 · Hagerman: 0/100
No gap.
Buhl: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hagerman: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Buhl: 4/100 · Hagerman: 8/100
Hagerman is 4 points higher.
Buhl: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hagerman: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Buhl: Unavailable · Hagerman: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Buhl: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Hagerman: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Buhl: 50/100 · Hagerman: 53/100
Hagerman is 3 points higher.
Buhl: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Hagerman: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Buhl: 17/100 · Hagerman: 17/100
No gap.
Buhl: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Hagerman: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Compare with another city