City vs city
Tama vs Vining, IA
Tama currently scores 3 points higher overall than Vining, with the largest gap in tornado.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Tama: 37/100 · Vining: 34/100
Tama is 3 points higher.
Flood
Tama: 78/100 · Vining: 75/100
Tama is 3 points higher.
Tama: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 7 features intersect this tile.
Vining: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 7 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Tama: 18/100 · Vining: 18/100
No gap.
Tama: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Vining: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Tama: 45/100 · Vining: 44/100
Tama is 1 points higher.
Tama: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Vining: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Tama: 12/100 · Vining: 4/100
Tama is 8 points higher.
Tama: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Vining: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Tama: 26/100 · Vining: 23/100
Tama is 3 points higher.
Tama: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Vining: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Tama: Unavailable · Vining: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Tama: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Vining: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Tama: 54/100 · Vining: 51/100
Tama is 3 points higher.
Tama: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Vining: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Tama: 24/100 · Vining: 24/100
No gap.
Tama: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Vining: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.