City vs city
Lilburn vs Tucker, GA
Tucker currently scores 2 points higher overall than Lilburn, with the largest gap in tornado.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Lilburn: 44/100 · Tucker: 46/100
Tucker is 2 points higher.
Flood
Lilburn: 35/100 · Tucker: 37/100
Tucker is 2 points higher.
Lilburn: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 7 features intersect this tile.
Tucker: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 7 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Lilburn: 16/100 · Tucker: 16/100
No gap.
Lilburn: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Tucker: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Lilburn: 60/100 · Tucker: 60/100
No gap.
Lilburn: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tucker: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Lilburn: 4/100 · Tucker: 15/100
Tucker is 11 points higher.
Lilburn: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Tucker: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Lilburn: 100/100 · Tucker: 100/100
No gap.
Lilburn: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Tucker: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Lilburn: Unavailable · Tucker: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Lilburn: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Tucker: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Lilburn: 64/100 · Tucker: 61/100
Lilburn is 3 points higher.
Lilburn: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Tucker: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Lilburn: 31/100 · Tucker: 33/100
Tucker is 2 points higher.
Lilburn: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Tucker: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.