City vs city
Evans vs Washington, GA
Evans currently scores 8 points higher overall than Washington, with the largest gap in hail.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Evans: 39/100 · Washington: 31/100
Evans is 8 points higher.
Flood
Evans: 1/100 · Washington: 30/100
Washington is 29 points higher.
Evans: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 1 features intersect this tile.
Washington: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 2 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Evans: 20/100 · Washington: 17/100
Evans is 3 points higher.
Evans: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Washington: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Evans: 60/100 · Washington: 56/100
Evans is 4 points higher.
Evans: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Washington: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Evans: 8/100 · Washington: 8/100
No gap.
Evans: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Washington: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Evans: 83/100 · Washington: 25/100
Evans is 58 points higher.
Evans: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Washington: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Evans: Unavailable · Washington: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Evans: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Washington: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Evans: 73/100 · Washington: 56/100
Evans is 17 points higher.
Evans: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Washington: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Evans: 26/100 · Washington: 28/100
Washington is 2 points higher.
Evans: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Washington: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Compare with another city