City vs city
Eatonton vs Greensboro, GA
Eatonton currently scores 7 points higher overall than Greensboro, with the largest gap in hail.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Eatonton: 45/100 · Greensboro: 38/100
Eatonton is 7 points higher.
Flood
Eatonton: 28/100 · Greensboro: 33/100
Greensboro is 5 points higher.
Eatonton: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 5 features intersect this tile.
Greensboro: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 2 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Eatonton: 17/100 · Greensboro: 17/100
No gap.
Eatonton: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Greensboro: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Eatonton: 54/100 · Greensboro: 56/100
Greensboro is 2 points higher.
Eatonton: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Greensboro: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Eatonton: 0/100 · Greensboro: 0/100
No gap.
Eatonton: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Greensboro: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Eatonton: 72/100 · Greensboro: 46/100
Eatonton is 26 points higher.
Eatonton: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Greensboro: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Eatonton: Unavailable · Greensboro: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Eatonton: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Greensboro: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Eatonton: 69/100 · Greensboro: 48/100
Eatonton is 21 points higher.
Eatonton: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Greensboro: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Eatonton: 30/100 · Greensboro: 30/100
No gap.
Eatonton: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Greensboro: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.