City vs city
Cumming vs Sugar Hill, GA
Cumming currently scores 6 points higher overall than Sugar Hill, with the largest gap in hail.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Cumming: 48/100 · Sugar Hill: 42/100
Cumming is 6 points higher.
Flood
Cumming: 37/100 · Sugar Hill: 58/100
Sugar Hill is 21 points higher.
Cumming: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 8 features intersect this tile.
Sugar Hill: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 12 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Cumming: 15/100 · Sugar Hill: 15/100
No gap.
Cumming: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Sugar Hill: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Cumming: 57/100 · Sugar Hill: 56/100
Cumming is 1 points higher.
Cumming: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Sugar Hill: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Cumming: 31/100 · Sugar Hill: 19/100
Cumming is 12 points higher.
Cumming: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Sugar Hill: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Cumming: 100/100 · Sugar Hill: 52/100
Cumming is 48 points higher.
Cumming: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Sugar Hill: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Cumming: Unavailable · Sugar Hill: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Cumming: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Sugar Hill: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Cumming: 70/100 · Sugar Hill: 66/100
Cumming is 4 points higher.
Cumming: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Sugar Hill: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Cumming: 29/100 · Sugar Hill: 29/100
No gap.
Cumming: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Sugar Hill: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.