City vs city
Parker vs Salt Springs, FL
Parker currently scores 6 points higher overall than Salt Springs, with the largest gap in tornado.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Parker: 55/100 · Salt Springs: 49/100
Parker is 6 points higher.
Flood
Parker: 41/100 · Salt Springs: 48/100
Salt Springs is 7 points higher.
Parker: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 20 features intersect this tile.
Salt Springs: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 10 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Parker: 40/100 · Salt Springs: 36/100
Parker is 4 points higher.
Parker: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Salt Springs: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Parker: 53/100 · Salt Springs: 100/100
Salt Springs is 47 points higher.
Parker: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Salt Springs: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Parker: 100/100 · Salt Springs: 0/100
Parker is 100 points higher.
Parker: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Salt Springs: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Parker: 31/100 · Salt Springs: 3/100
Parker is 28 points higher.
Parker: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Salt Springs: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Parker: 95/100 · Salt Springs: 66/100
Parker is 29 points higher.
Parker: Storm surge exposure derived from NOAA SLOSH MOM (AGL) data.
Salt Springs: Storm surge exposure derived from NOAA SLOSH MOM (AGL) data.
Wildfire
Parker: 55/100 · Salt Springs: 71/100
Salt Springs is 16 points higher.
Parker: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Salt Springs: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Parker: 21/100 · Salt Springs: 19/100
Parker is 2 points higher.
Parker: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Salt Springs: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.