City vs city
Buckingham vs Salt Springs, FL
Buckingham currently scores 5 points higher overall than Salt Springs, with the largest gap in storm surge.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Buckingham: 54/100 · Salt Springs: 49/100
Buckingham is 5 points higher.
Flood
Buckingham: 41/100 · Salt Springs: 48/100
Salt Springs is 7 points higher.
Buckingham: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 18 features intersect this tile.
Salt Springs: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 10 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Buckingham: 57/100 · Salt Springs: 36/100
Buckingham is 21 points higher.
Buckingham: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Salt Springs: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Buckingham: 87/100 · Salt Springs: 100/100
Salt Springs is 13 points higher.
Buckingham: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Salt Springs: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Buckingham: 0/100 · Salt Springs: 0/100
No gap.
Buckingham: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Salt Springs: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Buckingham: 23/100 · Salt Springs: 3/100
Buckingham is 20 points higher.
Buckingham: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Salt Springs: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Buckingham: 89/100 · Salt Springs: 66/100
Buckingham is 23 points higher.
Buckingham: Storm surge exposure derived from NOAA SLOSH MOM (AGL) data.
Salt Springs: Storm surge exposure derived from NOAA SLOSH MOM (AGL) data.
Wildfire
Buckingham: 70/100 · Salt Springs: 71/100
Salt Springs is 1 points higher.
Buckingham: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Salt Springs: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Buckingham: 13/100 · Salt Springs: 19/100
Salt Springs is 6 points higher.
Buckingham: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Salt Springs: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.