← Back to Bear snapshotCity comparison page

City vs city

Bear vs Bowers, DE

Bowers currently scores 8 points higher overall than Bear, with the largest gap in flood.

Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.

Bowers

39/100

Open city page →

Hazard breakdown

Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.

Overall

Bear: 31/100 · Bowers: 39/100

Bowers is 8 points higher.

Flood

Bear: 3/100 · Bowers: 61/100

Bowers is 58 points higher.

Bear: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 1 features intersect this tile.

Bowers: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 10 features intersect this tile.

Wind

Bear: 22/100 · Bowers: 24/100

Bowers is 2 points higher.

Bear: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Bowers: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Lightning

Bear: 41/100 · Bowers: 22/100

Bear is 19 points higher.

Bear: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Bowers: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tornado

Bear: 15/100 · Bowers: 23/100

Bowers is 8 points higher.

Bear: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Bowers: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hail

Bear: 40/100 · Bowers: 8/100

Bear is 32 points higher.

Bear: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Bowers: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Storm surge

Bear: Unavailable · Bowers: 93/100

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Bear: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Bowers: Storm surge exposure derived from NOAA SLOSH MOM (AGL) data.

Wildfire

Bear: 46/100 · Bowers: 42/100

Bear is 4 points higher.

Bear: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Bowers: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Ingested air quality

Bear: 47/100 · Bowers: 39/100

Bear is 8 points higher.

Bear: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.

Bowers: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.