City vs city
Bogus Hill vs Hamden, CT
Hamden currently scores 3 points higher overall than Bogus Hill, with the largest gap in flood.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Bogus Hill: 31/100 · Hamden: 34/100
Hamden is 3 points higher.
Flood
Bogus Hill: 25/100 · Hamden: 52/100
Hamden is 27 points higher.
Bogus Hill: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 5 features intersect this tile.
Hamden: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 8 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Bogus Hill: 22/100 · Hamden: 27/100
Hamden is 5 points higher.
Bogus Hill: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Hamden: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Bogus Hill: 17/100 · Hamden: 14/100
Bogus Hill is 3 points higher.
Bogus Hill: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Hamden: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Bogus Hill: 15/100 · Hamden: 0/100
Bogus Hill is 15 points higher.
Bogus Hill: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hamden: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Bogus Hill: 40/100 · Hamden: 14/100
Bogus Hill is 26 points higher.
Bogus Hill: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hamden: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Bogus Hill: Unavailable · Hamden: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Bogus Hill: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Hamden: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Bogus Hill: 67/100 · Hamden: 64/100
Bogus Hill is 3 points higher.
Bogus Hill: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Hamden: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Bogus Hill: 28/100 · Hamden: 34/100
Hamden is 6 points higher.
Bogus Hill: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Hamden: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.