← Back to Kirk snapshotCity comparison page

City vs city

Kirk vs Wray, CO

Wray currently scores 3 points higher overall than Kirk, with the largest gap in lightning.

Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.

Hazard breakdown

Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.

Overall

Kirk: 37/100 · Wray: 40/100

Wray is 3 points higher.

Flood

Kirk: Unavailable · Wray: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Kirk: Flood model is not available for this location yet.

Wray: Flood model is not available for this location yet.

Wind

Kirk: 18/100 · Wray: 18/100

No gap.

Kirk: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Wray: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Lightning

Kirk: 47/100 · Wray: 62/100

Wray is 15 points higher.

Kirk: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Wray: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tornado

Kirk: 42/100 · Wray: 42/100

No gap.

Kirk: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Wray: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hail

Kirk: 100/100 · Wray: 100/100

No gap.

Kirk: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Wray: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Storm surge

Kirk: Unavailable · Wray: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Kirk: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Wray: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Wildfire

Kirk: 35/100 · Wray: 39/100

Wray is 4 points higher.

Kirk: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Wray: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Ingested air quality

Kirk: 18/100 · Wray: 18/100

No gap.

Kirk: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.

Wray: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.