City vs city
Kim vs Springfield, CO
Kim currently scores 4 points higher overall than Springfield, with the largest gap in hail.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Kim: 42/100 · Springfield: 38/100
Kim is 4 points higher.
Flood
Kim: 36/100 · Springfield: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Kim: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 1 features intersect this tile.
Springfield: Flood model is not available for this location yet.
Wind
Kim: 16/100 · Springfield: 17/100
Springfield is 1 points higher.
Kim: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Springfield: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Kim: 52/100 · Springfield: 47/100
Kim is 5 points higher.
Kim: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Springfield: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Kim: 12/100 · Springfield: 12/100
No gap.
Kim: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Springfield: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Kim: 85/100 · Springfield: 100/100
Springfield is 15 points higher.
Kim: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Springfield: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Kim: Unavailable · Springfield: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Kim: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Springfield: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Kim: 53/100 · Springfield: 50/100
Kim is 3 points higher.
Kim: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Springfield: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Kim: Unavailable · Springfield: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Kim: Air quality model is not available for this location yet.
Springfield: Air quality model is not available for this location yet.
Compare with another city