City vs city
Paxton vs Redding, CA
Redding currently scores 9 points higher overall than Paxton, with the largest gap in hail.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Paxton: 25/100 · Redding: 34/100
Redding is 9 points higher.
Flood
Paxton: 26/100 · Redding: 47/100
Redding is 21 points higher.
Paxton: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 2 features intersect this tile.
Redding: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 18 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Paxton: 5/100 · Redding: 4/100
Paxton is 1 points higher.
Paxton: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Redding: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Paxton: 2/100 · Redding: 5/100
Redding is 3 points higher.
Paxton: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Redding: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Paxton: 0/100 · Redding: 0/100
No gap.
Paxton: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Redding: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Paxton: 1/100 · Redding: 42/100
Redding is 41 points higher.
Paxton: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Redding: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Paxton: Unavailable · Redding: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Paxton: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Redding: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Paxton: 97/100 · Redding: 79/100
Paxton is 18 points higher.
Paxton: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Redding: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Paxton: 17/100 · Redding: 26/100
Redding is 9 points higher.
Paxton: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Redding: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.