← Back to McFarland snapshotCity comparison page

City vs city

McFarland vs San Francisco, CA

McFarland currently scores 1 points higher overall than San Francisco, with the largest gap in flood.

Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.

McFarland

26/100

Open city page →

San Francisco

25/100

Open city page →

Hazard breakdown

Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.

Overall

McFarland: 26/100 · San Francisco: 25/100

McFarland is 1 points higher.

Flood

McFarland: 74/100 · San Francisco: 26/100

McFarland is 48 points higher.

McFarland: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 9 features intersect this tile.

San Francisco: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 4 features intersect this tile.

Wind

McFarland: 4/100 · San Francisco: 2/100

McFarland is 2 points higher.

McFarland: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

San Francisco: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Lightning

McFarland: 2/100 · San Francisco: 0/100

McFarland is 2 points higher.

McFarland: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

San Francisco: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tornado

McFarland: 4/100 · San Francisco: 0/100

McFarland is 4 points higher.

McFarland: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

San Francisco: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hail

McFarland: 0/100 · San Francisco: 18/100

San Francisco is 18 points higher.

McFarland: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

San Francisco: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Storm surge

McFarland: Unavailable · San Francisco: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

McFarland: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

San Francisco: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Wildfire

McFarland: 44/100 · San Francisco: 52/100

San Francisco is 8 points higher.

McFarland: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

San Francisco: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Ingested air quality

McFarland: 26/100 · San Francisco: 25/100

McFarland is 1 points higher.

McFarland: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.

San Francisco: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.