City vs city
Kerman vs Sacramento, CA
Sacramento currently scores 3 points higher overall than Kerman, with the largest gap in hail.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Kerman: 22/100 · Sacramento: 25/100
Sacramento is 3 points higher.
Flood
Kerman: 32/100 · Sacramento: 32/100
No gap.
Kerman: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 2 features intersect this tile.
Sacramento: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 11 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Kerman: 4/100 · Sacramento: 4/100
No gap.
Kerman: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Sacramento: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Kerman: 1/100 · Sacramento: 0/100
Kerman is 1 points higher.
Kerman: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Sacramento: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Kerman: 4/100 · Sacramento: 4/100
No gap.
Kerman: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Sacramento: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Kerman: 13/100 · Sacramento: 7/100
Kerman is 6 points higher.
Kerman: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Sacramento: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Kerman: Unavailable · Sacramento: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Kerman: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Sacramento: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Kerman: 74/100 · Sacramento: 76/100
Sacramento is 2 points higher.
Kerman: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Sacramento: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Kerman: 27/100 · Sacramento: 27/100
No gap.
Kerman: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Sacramento: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.