← Back to Cool snapshotCity comparison page

City vs city

Cool vs Squaw Valley, CA

Cool currently scores 17 points higher overall than Squaw Valley, with the largest gap in ingested air quality.

Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.

Squaw Valley

20/100

Open city page →

Hazard breakdown

Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.

Overall

Cool: 37/100 · Squaw Valley: 20/100

Cool is 17 points higher.

Flood

Cool: 30/100 · Squaw Valley: 26/100

Cool is 4 points higher.

Cool: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 4 features intersect this tile.

Squaw Valley: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 2 features intersect this tile.

Wind

Cool: 4/100 · Squaw Valley: 5/100

Squaw Valley is 1 points higher.

Cool: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Squaw Valley: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Lightning

Cool: 2/100 · Squaw Valley: 2/100

No gap.

Cool: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Squaw Valley: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tornado

Cool: 0/100 · Squaw Valley: 0/100

No gap.

Cool: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Squaw Valley: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hail

Cool: 1/100 · Squaw Valley: 1/100

No gap.

Cool: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Squaw Valley: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Storm surge

Cool: Unavailable · Squaw Valley: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Cool: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Squaw Valley: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Wildfire

Cool: 87/100 · Squaw Valley: 65/100

Cool is 22 points higher.

Cool: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Squaw Valley: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Ingested air quality

Cool: 95/100 · Squaw Valley: 20/100

Cool is 75 points higher.

Cool: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.

Squaw Valley: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.