City vs city
Cool vs Running Springs, CA
Cool currently scores 13 points higher overall than Running Springs, with the largest gap in ingested air quality.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Cool: 37/100 · Running Springs: 24/100
Cool is 13 points higher.
Flood
Cool: 30/100 · Running Springs: 28/100
Cool is 2 points higher.
Cool: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 4 features intersect this tile.
Running Springs: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 3 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Cool: 4/100 · Running Springs: 5/100
Running Springs is 1 points higher.
Cool: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Running Springs: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Cool: 2/100 · Running Springs: 3/100
Running Springs is 1 points higher.
Cool: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Running Springs: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Cool: 0/100 · Running Springs: 0/100
No gap.
Cool: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Running Springs: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Cool: 1/100 · Running Springs: 2/100
Running Springs is 1 points higher.
Cool: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Running Springs: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Cool: Unavailable · Running Springs: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Cool: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Running Springs: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Cool: 87/100 · Running Springs: 79/100
Cool is 8 points higher.
Cool: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Running Springs: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Cool: 95/100 · Running Springs: 25/100
Cool is 70 points higher.
Cool: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Running Springs: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.