← Back to Cool snapshotCity comparison page

City vs city

Cool vs Hilmar-Irwin, CA

Cool currently scores 19 points higher overall than Hilmar-Irwin, with the largest gap in ingested air quality.

Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.

Hilmar-Irwin

18/100

Open city page →

Hazard breakdown

Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.

Overall

Cool: 37/100 · Hilmar-Irwin: 18/100

Cool is 19 points higher.

Flood

Cool: 30/100 · Hilmar-Irwin: 26/100

Cool is 4 points higher.

Cool: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 4 features intersect this tile.

Hilmar-Irwin: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 3 features intersect this tile.

Wind

Cool: 4/100 · Hilmar-Irwin: 3/100

Cool is 1 points higher.

Cool: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Hilmar-Irwin: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Lightning

Cool: 2/100 · Hilmar-Irwin: 1/100

Cool is 1 points higher.

Cool: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Hilmar-Irwin: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tornado

Cool: 0/100 · Hilmar-Irwin: 8/100

Hilmar-Irwin is 8 points higher.

Cool: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hilmar-Irwin: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hail

Cool: 1/100 · Hilmar-Irwin: 1/100

No gap.

Cool: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hilmar-Irwin: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Storm surge

Cool: Unavailable · Hilmar-Irwin: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Cool: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Hilmar-Irwin: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Wildfire

Cool: 87/100 · Hilmar-Irwin: 58/100

Cool is 29 points higher.

Cool: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Hilmar-Irwin: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Ingested air quality

Cool: 95/100 · Hilmar-Irwin: 28/100

Cool is 67 points higher.

Cool: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.

Hilmar-Irwin: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.