City vs city
Cool vs Fort Irwin, CA
Cool currently scores 21 points higher overall than Fort Irwin, with the largest gap in ingested air quality.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Cool: 37/100 · Fort Irwin: 16/100
Cool is 21 points higher.
Flood
Cool: 30/100 · Fort Irwin: 26/100
Cool is 4 points higher.
Cool: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 4 features intersect this tile.
Fort Irwin: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 1 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Cool: 4/100 · Fort Irwin: 6/100
Fort Irwin is 2 points higher.
Cool: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Fort Irwin: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Cool: 2/100 · Fort Irwin: 6/100
Fort Irwin is 4 points higher.
Cool: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Fort Irwin: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Cool: 0/100 · Fort Irwin: 0/100
No gap.
Cool: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Fort Irwin: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Cool: 1/100 · Fort Irwin: 0/100
Cool is 1 points higher.
Cool: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Fort Irwin: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Cool: Unavailable · Fort Irwin: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Cool: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Fort Irwin: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Cool: 87/100 · Fort Irwin: 22/100
Cool is 65 points higher.
Cool: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Fort Irwin: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Cool: 95/100 · Fort Irwin: 21/100
Cool is 74 points higher.
Cool: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Fort Irwin: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.