City vs city
Anderson vs Redding, CA
Redding currently scores 9 points higher overall than Anderson, with the largest gap in hail.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Anderson: 25/100 · Redding: 34/100
Redding is 9 points higher.
Flood
Anderson: 39/100 · Redding: 47/100
Redding is 8 points higher.
Anderson: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 14 features intersect this tile.
Redding: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 18 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Anderson: 4/100 · Redding: 4/100
No gap.
Anderson: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Redding: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Anderson: 4/100 · Redding: 5/100
Redding is 1 points higher.
Anderson: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Redding: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Anderson: 0/100 · Redding: 0/100
No gap.
Anderson: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Redding: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Anderson: 6/100 · Redding: 42/100
Redding is 36 points higher.
Anderson: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Redding: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Anderson: Unavailable · Redding: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Anderson: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Redding: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Anderson: 72/100 · Redding: 79/100
Redding is 7 points higher.
Anderson: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Redding: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Anderson: 27/100 · Redding: 26/100
Anderson is 1 points higher.
Anderson: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Redding: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.