City vs city
Patagonia vs Tubac, AZ
Tubac currently scores 2 points higher overall than Patagonia, with the largest gap in flood.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Patagonia: 35/100 · Tubac: 37/100
Tubac is 2 points higher.
Flood
Patagonia: 50/100 · Tubac: 66/100
Tubac is 16 points higher.
Patagonia: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 16 features intersect this tile.
Tubac: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 11 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Patagonia: 13/100 · Tubac: 12/100
Patagonia is 1 points higher.
Patagonia: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Tubac: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Patagonia: 46/100 · Tubac: 46/100
No gap.
Patagonia: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tubac: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Patagonia: 0/100 · Tubac: 0/100
No gap.
Patagonia: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Tubac: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Patagonia: 26/100 · Tubac: 19/100
Patagonia is 7 points higher.
Patagonia: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Tubac: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Patagonia: Unavailable · Tubac: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Patagonia: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Tubac: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Patagonia: 52/100 · Tubac: 59/100
Tubac is 7 points higher.
Patagonia: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Tubac: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Patagonia: 22/100 · Tubac: 21/100
Patagonia is 1 points higher.
Patagonia: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Tubac: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.