City vs city
Parks vs Williams, AZ
Parks currently scores 2 points higher overall than Williams, with the largest gap in ingested air quality.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Parks: 46/100 · Williams: 44/100
Parks is 2 points higher.
Flood
Parks: 35/100 · Williams: 36/100
Williams is 1 points higher.
Parks: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 1 features intersect this tile.
Williams: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 6 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Parks: 10/100 · Williams: 10/100
No gap.
Parks: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Williams: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Parks: 33/100 · Williams: 34/100
Williams is 1 points higher.
Parks: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Williams: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Parks: 0/100 · Williams: 0/100
No gap.
Parks: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Williams: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Parks: 32/100 · Williams: 14/100
Parks is 18 points higher.
Parks: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Williams: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Parks: Unavailable · Williams: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Parks: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Williams: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Parks: 95/100 · Williams: 83/100
Parks is 12 points higher.
Parks: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Williams: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Parks: 68/100 · Williams: 89/100
Williams is 21 points higher.
Parks: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Williams: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Compare with another city