City vs city
Page vs Tuba City, AZ
Page currently scores 1 points higher overall than Tuba City, with the largest gap in wildfire.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Page: 22/100 · Tuba City: 21/100
Page is 1 points higher.
Flood
Page: 38/100 · Tuba City: 35/100
Page is 3 points higher.
Page: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 2 features intersect this tile.
Tuba City: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 1 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Page: 10/100 · Tuba City: 10/100
No gap.
Page: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Tuba City: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Page: 17/100 · Tuba City: 20/100
Tuba City is 3 points higher.
Page: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tuba City: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Page: 0/100 · Tuba City: 0/100
No gap.
Page: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Tuba City: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Page: 2/100 · Tuba City: 4/100
Tuba City is 2 points higher.
Page: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Tuba City: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Page: Unavailable · Tuba City: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Page: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Tuba City: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Page: 33/100 · Tuba City: 23/100
Page is 10 points higher.
Page: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Tuba City: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Page: 32/100 · Tuba City: 32/100
No gap.
Page: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Tuba City: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Compare with another city