City vs city
Meadview vs White Hills, AZ
Meadview currently scores 8 points higher overall than White Hills, with the largest gap in flood.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Meadview: 27/100 · White Hills: 19/100
Meadview is 8 points higher.
Flood
Meadview: 45/100 · White Hills: 0/100
Meadview is 45 points higher.
Meadview: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 5 features intersect this tile.
White Hills: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 0 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Meadview: 9/100 · White Hills: 8/100
Meadview is 1 points higher.
Meadview: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
White Hills: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Meadview: 20/100 · White Hills: 15/100
Meadview is 5 points higher.
Meadview: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
White Hills: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Meadview: 0/100 · White Hills: 0/100
No gap.
Meadview: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
White Hills: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Meadview: 3/100 · White Hills: 0/100
Meadview is 3 points higher.
Meadview: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
White Hills: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Meadview: Unavailable · White Hills: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Meadview: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
White Hills: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Meadview: 57/100 · White Hills: 42/100
Meadview is 15 points higher.
Meadview: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
White Hills: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Meadview: 25/100 · White Hills: 28/100
White Hills is 3 points higher.
Meadview: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
White Hills: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.