City vs city
Newark vs Tuckerman, AR
Newark currently scores 5 points higher overall than Tuckerman, with the largest gap in hail.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Newark: 43/100 · Tuckerman: 38/100
Newark is 5 points higher.
Flood
Newark: 45/100 · Tuckerman: 48/100
Tuckerman is 3 points higher.
Newark: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 2 features intersect this tile.
Tuckerman: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 4 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Newark: 15/100 · Tuckerman: 15/100
No gap.
Newark: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Tuckerman: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Newark: 70/100 · Tuckerman: 67/100
Newark is 3 points higher.
Newark: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tuckerman: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Newark: 8/100 · Tuckerman: 35/100
Tuckerman is 27 points higher.
Newark: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Tuckerman: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Newark: 87/100 · Tuckerman: 27/100
Newark is 60 points higher.
Newark: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Tuckerman: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Newark: Unavailable · Tuckerman: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Newark: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Tuckerman: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Newark: 47/100 · Tuckerman: 47/100
No gap.
Newark: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Tuckerman: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Newark: 27/100 · Tuckerman: 27/100
No gap.
Newark: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Tuckerman: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.