City vs city
Lavaca vs Rogers, AR
Rogers currently scores 2 points higher overall than Lavaca, with the largest gap in wildfire.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Lavaca: 46/100 · Rogers: 48/100
Rogers is 2 points higher.
Flood
Lavaca: 55/100 · Rogers: 28/100
Lavaca is 27 points higher.
Lavaca: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 7 features intersect this tile.
Rogers: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 3 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Lavaca: 15/100 · Rogers: 16/100
Rogers is 1 points higher.
Lavaca: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Rogers: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Lavaca: 88/100 · Rogers: 68/100
Lavaca is 20 points higher.
Lavaca: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Rogers: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Lavaca: 27/100 · Rogers: 38/100
Rogers is 11 points higher.
Lavaca: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Rogers: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Lavaca: 96/100 · Rogers: 100/100
Rogers is 4 points higher.
Lavaca: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Rogers: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Lavaca: Unavailable · Rogers: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Lavaca: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Rogers: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Lavaca: 16/100 · Rogers: 53/100
Rogers is 37 points higher.
Lavaca: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Rogers: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Lavaca: 27/100 · Rogers: 30/100
Rogers is 3 points higher.
Lavaca: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Rogers: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.