City vs city
Jacksonport vs Tuckerman, AR
Jacksonport currently scores 6 points higher overall than Tuckerman, with the largest gap in flood.
Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.
Hazard breakdown
Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.
Overall
Jacksonport: 44/100 · Tuckerman: 38/100
Jacksonport is 6 points higher.
Flood
Jacksonport: 90/100 · Tuckerman: 48/100
Jacksonport is 42 points higher.
Jacksonport: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 9 features intersect this tile.
Tuckerman: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 4 features intersect this tile.
Wind
Jacksonport: 14/100 · Tuckerman: 15/100
Tuckerman is 1 points higher.
Jacksonport: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Tuckerman: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.
Lightning
Jacksonport: 69/100 · Tuckerman: 67/100
Jacksonport is 2 points higher.
Jacksonport: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tuckerman: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.
Tornado
Jacksonport: 27/100 · Tuckerman: 35/100
Tuckerman is 8 points higher.
Jacksonport: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Tuckerman: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Hail
Jacksonport: 49/100 · Tuckerman: 27/100
Jacksonport is 22 points higher.
Jacksonport: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Tuckerman: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.
Storm surge
Jacksonport: Unavailable · Tuckerman: Unavailable
A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.
Jacksonport: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Tuckerman: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.
Wildfire
Jacksonport: 34/100 · Tuckerman: 47/100
Tuckerman is 13 points higher.
Jacksonport: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Tuckerman: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.
Ingested air quality
Jacksonport: 27/100 · Tuckerman: 27/100
No gap.
Jacksonport: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.
Tuckerman: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.