← Back to Hope snapshotCity comparison page

City vs city

Hope vs Rogers, AR

Hope currently scores 5 points higher overall than Rogers, with the largest gap in tornado.

Use this comparison for relocation decisions, insurance shopping, and hazard-prioritized mitigation planning.

Rogers

48/100

Open city page →

Hazard breakdown

Scores describe each city’s reference grid tile, not every property. A missing model is unavailable, not zero risk. Air quality uses an ingested EPA AirNow snapshot and may not reflect current conditions; other factors describe baseline exposure. The overall score blends different hazards and is not a probability of damage. Read the scoring methodology and sources.

Overall

Hope: 53/100 · Rogers: 48/100

Hope is 5 points higher.

Flood

Hope: 34/100 · Rogers: 28/100

Hope is 6 points higher.

Hope: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 4 features intersect this tile.

Rogers: FEMA NFHL flood zones: 3 features intersect this tile.

Wind

Hope: 14/100 · Rogers: 16/100

Rogers is 2 points higher.

Hope: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Rogers: Wind exposure derived from ingested design wind / climatology tiles.

Lightning

Hope: 86/100 · Rogers: 68/100

Hope is 18 points higher.

Hope: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Rogers: Lightning exposure derived from ingested climatology tiles.

Tornado

Hope: 62/100 · Rogers: 38/100

Hope is 24 points higher.

Hope: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Rogers: Tornado risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Hail

Hope: 100/100 · Rogers: 100/100

No gap.

Hope: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Rogers: Hail risk derived from NOAA SPC historical reports.

Storm surge

Hope: Unavailable · Rogers: Unavailable

A score difference cannot be calculated without both sources.

Hope: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Rogers: Storm surge model is not available for this location yet.

Wildfire

Hope: 50/100 · Rogers: 53/100

Rogers is 3 points higher.

Hope: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Rogers: Wildfire exposure derived from ingested fire potential tiles.

Ingested air quality

Hope: 27/100 · Rogers: 30/100

Rogers is 3 points higher.

Hope: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.

Rogers: Air quality score derived from the latest ingested EPA AirNow AQI grid; may not reflect current conditions. See methodology for the recorded ingest date.